Texas Prosecutors May Seek Charges Against ICE Agent After Crash Injures Man

Study the questions and tasks

Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.

Practice level

C2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.

Question formats

Single choice

How to approach this practice

Read the passage for its main idea, then return to the relevant sentence or paragraph for each question. Base answers on the passage.

1. Question 1 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What is the article's principal purpose?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. To establish the agent's guilt beyond reasonable doubt
   2. To clarify an investigation's implications without prejudging the case
   3. To criticize ICE's immigration-enforcement policies
   4. To reconstruct the crash from eyewitness testimony
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   To clarify an investigation's implications without prejudging the case

   It clarifies the legal significance and limits of an investigative finding.

   The district attorney’s statement does not constitute a criminal charge, a trial outcome, or a finding of guilt.

2. Question 2 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Why does the article describe the investigators' conclusion as central?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It identifies the precise offense committed
   2. It confirms that a trial has begun
   3. It shifts the incident toward possible criminal review
   4. It proves the injured man caused the collision
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   It shifts the incident toward possible criminal review

   The conclusion changes how authorities may legally approach the incident.

   That conclusion is the central development in the case: it places the incident under possible criminal scrutiny rather than treating it simply as an unintended collision.

3. Question 3 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What can be inferred about a formal accusation from the article?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It automatically follows an investigative assessment
   2. It requires a separate evaluation of available evidence
   3. It can be issued only after a court verdict
   4. It concerns administrative matters rather than criminal law
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   It requires a separate evaluation of available evidence

   An investigative assessment alone does not satisfy the threshold for prosecution.

   Investigators can reach an assessment about an event while prosecutors separately determine whether the available evidence supports a formal accusation.

4. Question 4 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does “That process” refer to in the final paragraph?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. ICE's routine enforcement activities
   2. The injured man's medical treatment
   3. The progression from investigation toward possible charges
   4. The publication of the news report
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   The progression from investigation toward possible charges

   The phrase points to the sequence of decisions governing possible legal action.

   Any eventual legal action would depend on the next decisions in that process.

5. Question 5 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Which organizational pattern structures the article?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Chronological testimony followed by personal commentary
   2. Initial finding followed by legal qualification and procedural explanation
   3. Statistical comparison followed by policy recommendations
   4. Biographical profile followed by historical background
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Initial finding followed by legal qualification and procedural explanation

   The article moves from the finding to its legal limits and institutional context.

   The case also illustrates the separate roles within the justice system.

6. Question 6 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What limitation does the article place on interpreting the investigators' conclusion?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It cannot establish which precise offense may be pursued
   2. It cannot identify anyone injured in the crash
   3. It cannot involve federal agencies
   4. It cannot be considered by prosecutors
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   It cannot establish which precise offense may be pursued

   The conclusion does not identify the precise offense or establish guilt.

   It does not, by itself, establish the precise offense that prosecutors might pursue.

7. Question 7 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Why does the article mention an official vehicle or law-enforcement officer?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. To explain why every such crash is automatically criminal
   2. To indicate why the legal classification may receive particular attention
   3. To show that the officer has already been convicted
   4. To establish federal jurisdiction over all traffic cases
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   To indicate why the legal classification may receive particular attention

   Such circumstances can make the accidental-versus-unlawful distinction especially consequential.

   That distinction can be especially important when an injury results from an encounter involving an official vehicle or a law-enforcement officer.

8. Question 8 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Which statement best synthesizes the article's conclusion?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Charges have already been filed and proven
   2. Investigators have withdrawn their initial assessment
   3. Possible charges remain dependent on later prosecutorial decisions
   4. The court has determined the crash was intentional
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Possible charges remain dependent on later prosecutorial decisions

   The article presents possible charges as contingent on subsequent procedural decisions.

   The district attorney’s position means that prosecutors may consider charges against the ICE agent.

What to review next

Find the words that support each answer. For a mistake, compare the question with the evidence and identify the detail or inference you missed.

A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.

Before you practise: a worked example

Look for evidence in the text. Separate what the writer says from what you already know about the topic.

The library normally closes at six, but on Fridays it stays open until eight. When does it close on Friday?

The answer is eight. But introduces an exception to the normal closing time, so the first time mentioned is not the answer.

This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.