Mexico’s Baja California prepares for Hurricane Polo as Hurricane Nolo moves away from Hawaii
Practice C1 English reading with 7 questions based on the Daily News article “Mexico’s Baja California prepares for Hurricane Polo as Hurricane Nolo moves away from Hawaii”.
About this practice test
Practice C1 English reading with 7 questions based on the Daily News article “Mexico’s Baja California prepares for Hurricane Polo as Hurricane Nolo moves away from Hawaii”.
What you’ll practice
Finding detail
Locate specific information and evidence.
Interpreting ideas
Connect main points and inferences.
Evaluating arguments
Assess claims, evidence, and limitations.
Study the questions and tasks
Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.
- Practice level
- C1. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.
- Question formats
- Single choice
How to approach this practice
Read the passage for its main idea, then return to the relevant sentence or paragraph for each question. Base answers on the passage.
News lesson for this practice
Read the complete article and use its text or audio alongside these exercises: Mexico’s Baja California prepares for Hurricane Polo as Hurricane Nolo moves away from Hawaii.
Mexico’s Baja California prepares for Hurricane Polo as Hurricane Nolo moves away from Hawaii
Major Hurricane Polo is approaching Mexico’s Baja California peninsula, according to reports published on September 28. The coverage identifies several hazards associated with the storm, including storm surge, high winds, and heavy rain. These conditions could create serious risks along the peninsula, although the available reports do not specify a landfall location or describe confirmed effects. At the same time, Hurricane Nolo is moving farther away from the Hawaiian Islands.…
-
Question 1 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What is the article’s central purpose?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- To compare two hurricane situations and clarify their documented risks
- To predict both storms’ exact landfall locations and impacts
- To explain the historical causes of Pacific hurricanes
- To evaluate emergency responses already implemented in both regions
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- To compare two hurricane situations and clarify their documented risks
It compares two regional storms while distinguishing reported hazards from unsupported claims.
Taken together, the coverage presents a divided regional picture.
-
Question 2 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What can be inferred about Nolo’s changing position?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Nolo has completely ceased producing hazardous weather
- Nolo’s movement reduces some risks without eliminating all effects
- Nolo is turning back toward the Hawaiian Islands
- Nolo has already caused confirmed flooding across Hawaii
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Nolo’s movement reduces some risks without eliminating all effects
Its movement away is treated as relevant but insufficient to remove local danger.
However, the storm’s departure does not eliminate the danger in the islands.
-
Question 3 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What does “The distinction” refer to?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- The difference between Polo’s approach and Nolo’s retreat
- The difference between rainfall and coastal flooding
- The difference between reports published on different dates
- The difference between major and minor hurricanes
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- The difference between Polo’s approach and Nolo’s retreat
It refers to the contrasting directions and continuing hazards of the two storms.
The distinction shows why a storm’s direction is only one part of assessing its effects.
-
Question 4 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Why does the article mention that no landfall location is specified?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- To indicate that the available evidence cannot support precise impact claims
- To prove that Polo will not make landfall anywhere
- To establish that the reports contain conflicting forecasts
- To explain why Nolo is moving away from Hawaii
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- To indicate that the available evidence cannot support precise impact claims
The omission limits how precisely readers can assess Polo’s expected effects.
The available reports do not specify a landfall location or describe confirmed effects.
-
Question 5 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
How is the article organized overall?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Chronologically, from earlier forecasts to later evacuations
- By examining each storm before synthesizing their contrasting risks
- By listing historical hurricanes before discussing current conditions
- By presenting official responses before describing the storms
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- By examining each storm before synthesizing their contrasting risks
It first examines each storm, compares them, then identifies reporting limits.
The reports therefore describe two separate hurricane situations across the Pacific.
-
Question 6 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What relationship does the article establish between direction and effects?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Direction is irrelevant when evaluating any hurricane
- Direction matters, but associated hazards must also be considered
- A storm moving away always creates greater danger
- Storm direction directly determines the amount of damage
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Direction matters, but associated hazards must also be considered
The article argues that movement alone cannot determine continuing consequences.
The distinction shows why a storm’s direction is only one part of assessing its effects.
-
Question 7 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What limitation most clearly prevents stronger conclusions about Polo?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- The reports provide no information about Polo’s existence
- The reports omit confirmed consequences and detailed intensity information
- The reports focus exclusively on Hawaii’s weather conditions
- The reports describe only historical hurricane activity
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- The reports omit confirmed consequences and detailed intensity information
The article lacks confirmed impacts and additional intensity details.
It also offers no additional details about Polo’s intensity beyond classifying it as a major hurricane.
What to review next
Find the words that support each answer. For a mistake, compare the question with the evidence and identify the detail or inference you missed.
A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.
Before you practise: a worked example
Look for evidence in the text. Separate what the writer says from what you already know about the topic.
The library normally closes at six, but on Fridays it stays open until eight. When does it close on Friday?
The answer is eight. But introduces an exception to the normal closing time, so the first time mentioned is not the answer.
This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.