Kent is having a champagne moment: ‘English wine has gone from a joke to world-class’

Study the questions and tasks

Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.

Practice level

C1. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.

Question formats

Single choice

How to approach this practice

Read the passage for its main idea, then return to the relevant sentence or paragraph for each question. Base answers on the passage.

1. Question 1 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What is the article’s principal purpose?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. To assess English wine’s commercial performance using industry data
   2. To summarize the feature’s confirmed scope and evidential limitations
   3. To identify Kent’s most successful vineyards and producers
   4. To compare English wine with champagne through technical analysis
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   To summarize the feature’s confirmed scope and evidential limitations

   It delineates the feature’s confirmed subject while carefully limiting unsupported conclusions.

   As a result, the article’s confirmed scope remains limited: it is a Guardian travel feature concerning Kent and English wine, with the headline offering a particular interpretation of the subject.

2. Question 2 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does “Those details” refer to in the second paragraph?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The headline’s metaphors and evaluative language
   2. The publication date and travel classification
   3. Specific places, people, products, and local activities
   4. The photograph’s credit and visual composition
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Specific places, people, products, and local activities

   The phrase refers collectively to the specific information the package does not identify.

   It does not identify a vineyard, producer, wine, tasting, visitor attraction, business or particular community in Kent.

3. Question 3 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Why does the article mention the lack of awards and production figures?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. To demonstrate that Kent has no active wine industry
   2. To explain why the feature belongs outside the travel category
   3. To show that the headline’s broad claim lacks supporting evidence
   4. To establish that the photograph misrepresents the region
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   To show that the headline’s broad claim lacks supporting evidence

   Their absence prevents the headline’s evaluation from becoming independently substantiated.

   There are no supporting quotations, awards, production figures, comparisons, technical details or accounts of changing visitor numbers.

4. Question 4 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What relationship exists between the headline and the package’s evidential stance?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The package endorses the headline without qualification
   2. The package rejects the headline as demonstrably inaccurate
   3. The package recognizes the framing but limits its evidential force
   4. The package replaces the headline with a technical classification
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   The package recognizes the framing but limits its evidential force

   The headline frames a transformation, whereas the package withholds independent confirmation.

   That contrast is important to the story’s framing, but the package does not establish it as an independently demonstrated conclusion.

5. Question 5 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What organizational move concludes the article?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It introduces a new vineyard as the article’s central setting
   2. It calls for additional verified material before further claims are made
   3. It evaluates the photograph’s aesthetic and documentary value
   4. It supplies statistics that confirm the headline’s interpretation
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   It calls for additional verified material before further claims are made

   The conclusion identifies the information needed to expand the account responsibly.

   A fuller account of the places, people and evidence behind the feature would require access to the verified article text or a broader source package.

6. Question 6 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What can be inferred about the article’s treatment of the photograph?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The photograph is treated as evidence of English wine’s quality
   2. The photograph is assumed to depict a specific Kent vineyard
   3. The photograph’s subject remains deliberately undetermined
   4. The photograph is identified as unrelated to the feature
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   The photograph’s subject remains deliberately undetermined

   The article separates attribution from interpretation because no visual description is available.

   No description of the image is provided, so its content cannot be inferred from the credit.

7. Question 7 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Which claim is explicitly restricted by the supplied material?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The Guardian published a travel feature
   2. Kent appears in the headline
   3. English wine is definitively world-class
   4. The photograph has a named credit
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   English wine is definitively world-class

   The text warns against expanding headline language into an industry-wide conclusion.

   The phrase should therefore be understood as part of the headline’s presentation, rather than expanded into a wider claim about the wine industry.

What to review next

Find the words that support each answer. For a mistake, compare the question with the evidence and identify the detail or inference you missed.

A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.

Before you practise: a worked example

Look for evidence in the text. Separate what the writer says from what you already know about the topic.

The library normally closes at six, but on Fridays it stays open until eight. When does it close on Friday?

The answer is eight. But introduces an exception to the normal closing time, so the first time mentioned is not the answer.

This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.