California High-Speed Rail Authority Chief Executive Steps Down After Spending Questions
About this practice test
Practice C1 English reading with 7 questions based on the Daily News article “California High-Speed Rail Authority Chief Executive Steps Down After Spending Questions”.
What you’ll practice
Finding detail
Locate specific information and evidence.
Interpreting ideas
Connect main points and inferences.
Evaluating arguments
Assess claims, evidence, and limitations.
Study the questions and tasks
Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.
- Practice level
- C1. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.
- Question formats
- Single choice
How to approach this practice
Read the passage for its main idea, then return to the relevant sentence or paragraph for each question. Base answers on the passage.
News lesson for this practice
Read the complete article and use its text or audio alongside these exercises: California High-Speed Rail Authority Chief Executive Steps Down After Spending Questions.
California High-Speed Rail Authority Chief Executive Steps Down After Spending Questions
Ian Choudri, the chief executive of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, has stepped down from his post. His departure came weeks after state investigators questioned $600,000 in spending by the agency. The known facts establish a sequence, rather than a confirmed explanation for the leadership change. Investigators raised questions about the spending, and Choudri left his position several weeks later. The information available does not identify the specific expenses involved…
-
Question 1 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What is the article’s principal purpose?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- To prove that Choudri committed financial misconduct
- To explain the agency’s future construction timetable
- To distinguish confirmed facts from unsupported conclusions
- To evaluate the investigators’ professional qualifications
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- To distinguish confirmed facts from unsupported conclusions
It separates established facts from interpretations that remain unsupported.
Any broader conclusion about the financial issue or Choudri’s reasons for leaving would go beyond the facts currently established.
-
Question 2 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What can reasonably be inferred about the article’s treatment of causation?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Causation is treated as possible but unconfirmed
- Causation is presented as legally established
- Causation is dismissed as completely impossible
- Causation is attributed to a change in construction plans
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Causation is treated as possible but unconfirmed
The article acknowledges temporal association while rejecting causal certainty.
It also does not establish that the questions about spending caused Choudri’s decision to step down.
-
Question 3 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
In the phrase “Their questions,” what does “Their” refer to?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Public confidence advocates
- State investigators
- Infrastructure managers
- Senior agency officials
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- State investigators
The pronoun refers to the state investigators introduced immediately beforehand.
State investigators are public officials who examine matters within their authority.
-
Question 4 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Why does the article discuss complex decisions involving contracts and planning?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- To identify the disputed expenses
- To explain the agency’s construction delays
- To contextualize the need for financial oversight
- To predict the authority’s next executive appointment
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- To contextualize the need for financial oversight
That context explains why financial oversight is especially important.
Large public infrastructure bodies commonly manage complex decisions involving contracts, planning, and expenditure.
-
Question 5 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What organizational pattern most clearly shapes the article?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Chronological narrative followed by a fictional scenario
- Confirmed event followed by cautious contextual analysis
- Technical explanation followed by financial recommendations
- Biographical profile followed by institutional history
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Confirmed event followed by cautious contextual analysis
It moves from the event to limitations, implications, and unresolved developments.
The known facts establish a sequence, rather than a confirmed explanation for the leadership change.
-
Question 6 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which limitation does the article emphasize most consistently?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- The agency lacks authority over public spending
- The resignation occurred before any questions were raised
- The account provides no confirmed motive or investigative conclusion
- The article lacks evidence that Choudri held an executive role
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- The account provides no confirmed motive or investigative conclusion
The account repeatedly notes that motives and investigative outcomes remain unknown.
The information available does not identify the specific expenses involved or state what conclusions investigators reached.
-
Question 7 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What broader significance does the article assign to the resignation?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It resolves the agency’s financial dispute
- It connects financial oversight with leadership continuity
- It confirms wrongdoing within the authority
- It guarantees disruption to infrastructure work
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It connects financial oversight with leadership continuity
It links leadership change with public scrutiny of financial management.
The development nevertheless joins two issues that can affect public confidence: oversight of government spending and continuity of leadership.
What to review next
Find the words that support each answer. For a mistake, compare the question with the evidence and identify the detail or inference you missed.
A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.
Before you practise: a worked example
Look for evidence in the text. Separate what the writer says from what you already know about the topic.
The library normally closes at six, but on Fridays it stays open until eight. When does it close on Friday?
The answer is eight. But introduces an exception to the normal closing time, so the first time mentioned is not the answer.
This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.