Bomb Threat Hoaxes Disrupt Flights Across Italy, Poland and Spain

Study the questions and tasks

Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.

Practice level

C2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.

Question formats

Single choice

How to approach this practice

Read the questions, then listen before opening the transcript. Notice names, numbers and any corrections the speaker makes.

1. Question 1 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   According to the narration, what was the status of the threats after investigation?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. They were confirmed as credible warnings.
   2. They were later found to be hoaxes.
   3. They remained under investigation without a finding.
   4. They were traced to a single source.
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   They were later found to be hoaxes.

   The narration says the claims were ultimately found to be hoaxes.

   The threats were later found to be hoaxes, but their consequences were real for people whose journeys were interrupted.

2. Question 2 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What setting might passengers have expected instead of the place where some landed?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. A commercial airport
   2. A police station
   3. A railway terminal
   4. A hotel near the runway
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   A commercial airport

   The narration contrasts the base with an expected commercial airport.

   Such an arrival can be especially disorienting: travelers may expect a commercial airport, yet instead find themselves in an unfamiliar setting while authorities assess a possible danger.

3. Question 3 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What did passengers report doing as part of the response?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Providing names of the threat-makers
   2. Undergoing security checks
   3. Returning immediately to their original airports
   4. Giving evidence at a military hearing
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Undergoing security checks

   Passengers described undergoing checks while authorities responded.

   Passengers also described undergoing security checks.

4. Question 4 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does the narration say about the base involved in one account?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It was identified as a Polish air base.
   2. It was used by every diverted flight.
   3. Its identity and the relevant flight are unspecified.
   4. It was confirmed to be near a commercial airport.
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Its identity and the relevant flight are unspecified.

   Its identity and the flight that landed there are not specified.

   The supplied account does not identify the base or specify which flight landed there.

5. Question 5 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What is a bomb threat, as defined in the narration?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Evidence that an explosive device has been found
   2. An assertion that an explosive device may be present
   3. A report confirming an actual attack
   4. A guarantee that normal operations will stop
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   An assertion that an explosive device may be present

   The definition describes an assertion of possible presence, not proof.

   A bomb threat is an assertion that an explosive device may be present; it is not, by itself, proof that one exists.

6. Question 6 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Which sequence best reflects the common passenger experience described?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Threats established as false, then planned journeys began
   2. Checks and disruption, followed by certainty that threats were false
   3. A planned journey, then checks and disruption amid uncertainty
   4. A military landing, then immediate resumption of travel
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   A planned journey, then checks and disruption amid uncertainty

   Travel plans gave way to checks and disruption before falsity was established.

   What passengers had in common was the immediate experience of uncertainty: a planned journey gave way to checks and disruption before the threats were established as false.

7. Question 7 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Which possible cause of the threats does the narration identify?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. A dispute over airline schedules
   2. A coordinated political campaign
   3. A technical error aboard the planes
   4. No cause is specified
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   No cause is specified

   The narration gives no motive or prompting circumstance.

   The incidents spanned three countries, but the reported facts do not specify whether the threats were connected, who made them, or what prompted them.

8. Question 8 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What immediate consequences can responding to a hoax have for people already traveling?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It can redirect passengers, consume time, and unsettle them.
   2. It can confirm the existence of a device and prevent all delays.
   3. It can identify the threat-maker and connect incidents across countries.
   4. It can ensure that passengers continue on their original routes.
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   It can redirect passengers, consume time, and unsettle them.

   The stated effects include redirection, lost time, and distress.

   A hoax may leave no explosive device, but responding to it can still redirect passengers, consume time and unsettle people already in transit.

What to review next

Listen again to difficult sections, then open the transcript to check what you heard. Repeat a useful phrase aloud and try the recording once more without the text.

A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.

Before you practise: a worked example

Listen for the final information, especially when a speaker corrects or changes an earlier statement.

Example transcript: “Let’s meet at five — actually, half past five would be better.” What is the final suggested time?

The final suggested time is 5:30. Actually signals a correction; the first time is replaced by the later suggestion.

This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.