California High-Speed Rail Authority Chief Executive Steps Down After Spending Questions

Study the questions and tasks

Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.

Practice level

C1. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.

Question formats

Single choice

How to approach this practice

Read the questions, then listen before opening the transcript. Notice names, numbers and any corrections the speaker makes.

1. Question 1 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What amount of spending did investigators question?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. $60,000
   2. $600,000
   3. $6 million
   4. $60 million
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   $600,000

   The narration identifies the questioned spending as $600,000.

   His departure came weeks after state investigators questioned $600,000 in spending by the agency.

2. Question 2 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does the narration say remains unspecified about the spending?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The agency’s geographic location
   2. The executive’s job title
   3. The expenses and investigative conclusions
   4. The investigators’ legal authority
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   The expenses and investigative conclusions

   It states that the specific expenses and investigative conclusions are unknown.

   The information available does not identify the specific expenses involved or state what conclusions investigators reached.

3. Question 3 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What may investigators’ questions lead to, according to the narration?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Further review
   2. Automatic prosecution
   3. Immediate project completion
   4. Guaranteed executive replacement
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Further review

   The account says that questions can prompt additional review.

   Their questions can lead to further review, although the fact that questions have been raised does not itself indicate that wrongdoing occurred.

4. Question 4 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What leadership change is described at the end of the recording?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. A change at the highest executive level
   2. A transfer of investigative authority
   3. A restructuring of construction contracts
   4. A permanent reduction in public funding
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   A change at the highest executive level

   The authority’s chief executive has left his post, changing its highest executive level.

   Choudri’s resignation means the California High-Speed Rail Authority is undergoing a change at its highest executive level while the spending issue remains a matter of public attention.

5. Question 5 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does the narration say about possible effects on the authority’s work?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. They have already caused a measurable delay
   2. They are fully documented in the account
   3. They remain unspecified
   4. They will certainly be negative
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   They remain unspecified

   The account leaves those operational effects unresolved.

   The available facts do not say who will lead the agency next, whether investigators will take additional action, or what effect the departure may have on its work.

6. Question 6 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Why does the narration characterize the development as narrow but significant?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It resolves several unrelated investigations
   2. It combines a leadership departure with spending scrutiny
   3. It reveals the authority’s complete financial history
   4. It announces a new infrastructure strategy
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   It combines a leadership departure with spending scrutiny

   The event is limited in confirmed detail but important institutionally.

   For now, the central development is narrow but significant: the authority’s chief executive has stepped down after state investigators questioned agency spending.

7. Question 7 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What conclusion does the narration explicitly caution listeners against?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Concluding more than the evidence establishes
   2. Recognizing the leadership change
   3. Reporting the questioned spending figure
   4. Discussing public-sector accountability
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Concluding more than the evidence establishes

   It warns against extending the evidence beyond currently established facts.

   Any broader conclusion about the financial issue or Choudri’s reasons for leaving would go beyond the facts currently established.

What to review next

Listen again to difficult sections, then open the transcript to check what you heard. Repeat a useful phrase aloud and try the recording once more without the text.

A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.

Before you practise: a worked example

Listen for the final information, especially when a speaker corrects or changes an earlier statement.

Example transcript: “Let’s meet at five — actually, half past five would be better.” What is the final suggested time?

The final suggested time is 5:30. Actually signals a correction; the first time is replaced by the later suggestion.

This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.