Sandusky Lawyers Ask to Delay Hearing on Accuser’s Claimed Recantation
About this practice test
Practice C2 English vocabulary with 8 questions based on the Daily News article “Sandusky Lawyers Ask to Delay Hearing on Accuser’s Claimed Recantation”.
What you’ll practice
Meaning in context
Infer meaning from surrounding clues.
Precise word choice
Select useful words and phrases.
Natural combinations
Notice collocations and useful patterns.
Study the questions and tasks
Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.
- Practice level
- C2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.
- Question formats
- Single choice
How to approach this practice
Use the surrounding sentence to identify the meaning and word form needed. Check which words naturally go together.
News lesson for this practice
Read the complete article and use its text or audio alongside these exercises: Sandusky Lawyers Ask to Delay Hearing on Accuser’s Claimed Recantation.
-
Question 1 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which option best defines “recant” as used in the article?
- to formally withdraw or repudiate a previously stated belief, accusation, or testimony
- to postpone a proceeding because evidence is unavailable
- to distinguish two legally unrelated matters
- to summarize a disputed account neutrally
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- to formally withdraw or repudiate a previously stated belief, accusation, or testimony
The verb denotes formally withdrawing a previous accusation or statement.
-
Question 2 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which option best defines “postponed” as used in the article?
- publicly criticized after completion
- delayed until a later time, usually because circumstances make the original timing unsuitable
- formally concluded by an authority
- separated into competing allegations
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- delayed until a later time, usually because circumstances make the original timing unsuitable
It describes moving an event to a later time.
-
Question 3 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which option best defines “procedural” as used in the article?
- relating to emotional responses by witnesses
- relating to the factual truth of allegations
- relating to the formal processes or rules governing how a legal or administrative matter proceeds
- relating to historical background alone
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- relating to the formal processes or rules governing how a legal or administrative matter proceeds
The adjective concerns the formal process governing a matter.
-
Question 4 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which option best defines “distinguished” as used in the article?
- recognized or treated as separate because an important difference exists between two things
- proved identical through documentary evidence
- deliberately concealed from public view
- decided by a higher court
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- recognized or treated as separate because an important difference exists between two things
Here, it means treating two matters as separate because they differ.
-
Question 5 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which option best defines “confirms” as used in the article?
- questions the accuracy of a report
- establishes the truth or validity of something, typically by providing reliable information
- withdraws an accusation publicly
- assigns responsibility for a disputed event
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- establishes the truth or validity of something, typically by providing reliable information
The verb indicates that reliable information establishes the request’s existence.
-
Question 6 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which option best defines “concluded” as used in the article?
- reached a considered judgment or determination after examining relevant information
- delayed a hearing without explanation
- repeated an allegation verbatim
- introduced a new procedural request
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- reached a considered judgment or determination after examining relevant information
It refers to reaching a considered judgment after examining information.
-
Question 7 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which option best defines “renewed” as used in the article?
- legally invalidated after review
- revived or intensified after a period of reduced attention or activity
- carefully separated from another matter
- supported by newly discovered testimony
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- revived or intensified after a period of reduced attention or activity
The adjective signals attention that has returned or intensified.
-
Question 8 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which option best defines “restrained” as used in the article?
- highly emotional and accusatory
- carefully moderate, avoiding exaggeration, speculation, or excessive emotional force
- technically complex but factually unsupported
- designed to provoke renewed controversy
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- carefully moderate, avoiding exaggeration, speculation, or excessive emotional force
It describes deliberately measured language that avoids speculation or exaggeration.
What to review next
Keep a short list of unfamiliar words with their meanings and example sentences. Practise recalling them later, then use them in a sentence of your own.
A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.
Before you practise: a worked example
Read the whole sentence before choosing a word. Check both its meaning and the words it naturally combines with.
Please make an appointment before visiting the clinic.
Make an appointment is a natural word combination. Knowing a dictionary meaning alone may not tell you which verb fits.
This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.