Sandusky Lawyers Ask to Delay Hearing on Accuser’s Claimed Recantation

Study the questions and tasks

Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.

Practice level

C2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.

Question formats

Single choice

How to approach this practice

Read the passage for its main idea, then return to the relevant sentence or paragraph for each question. Base answers on the passage.

1. Question 1 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What is the article’s central emphasis regarding the latest development?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The likely verdict in the underlying case
   2. The timing and limited scope of the reported request
   3. The accuser’s reasons for changing his account
   4. The evidence expected at the hearing
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   The timing and limited scope of the reported request

   The article repeatedly foregrounds timing while withholding unsupported conclusions.

   The request makes the timing of the proceeding the central point of the latest reported development.

2. Question 2 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Why does the article present the two matters separately?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. To compare two competing legal teams
   2. To explain why the hearing was already completed
   3. To prevent conflating a procedural request with a recantation
   4. To establish that both matters have been adjudicated
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   To prevent conflating a procedural request with a recantation

   Separating them prevents a procedural request from being mistaken for substantive judgment.

   The situation involves two separate matters that should be distinguished carefully.

3. Question 3 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What can reasonably be inferred about the hearing’s current status?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It definitely has been canceled
   2. It definitely will occur as planned
   3. Its status remains unresolved
   4. It has been rescheduled publicly
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Its status remains unresolved

   The report confirms a request but gives no indication that authorities granted it.

   The supplied report does not say whether that request has been granted, nor does it provide a replacement date if the hearing is delayed.

4. Question 4 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does “Those gaps” refer to?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Missing information about motives, evidence, and assessment
   2. Uncertainty about Sandusky’s former employment
   3. The absence of any reported allegations
   4. Disagreement between athletic departments
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Missing information about motives, evidence, and assessment

   The phrase points back to several unexplained aspects of the proposed hearing.

   Those gaps make restrained wording essential.

5. Question 5 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What function does the final paragraph serve?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It predicts the court’s eventual decision
   2. It summarizes what is confirmed and what remains pending
   3. It introduces new evidence about the allegations
   4. It explains the accuser’s motivation
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   It summarizes what is confirmed and what remains pending

   It narrows the confirmed facts and reiterates the article’s cautionary stance.

   For now, the confirmed action is limited: Sandusky’s lawyers are seeking to put off the scheduled proceeding, while the accuser’s claim remains an issue the hearing was expected to examine.

6. Question 6 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Which relationship does the article establish between public context and legal resolution?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Context replaces the need for legal findings
   2. Context establishes the allegations as true
   3. Context informs readers without deciding disputed issues
   4. Context explains why the hearing was postponed
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Context informs readers without deciding disputed issues

   The contextual detail identifies the subject without resolving disputed legal questions.

   The source identifies Sandusky by his former position as an assistant football coach at Penn State, which supplies the relevant public context without resolving the legal questions surrounding the case.

7. Question 7 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What sequence does the article imply?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Hearing, allegations, then recantation
   2. Recantation, hearing, then original allegations
   3. Earlier allegations, later claim, then consideration at a hearing
   4. Public context, verdict, then allegations
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Earlier allegations, later claim, then consideration at a hearing

   The account concerns earlier allegations followed by a later claim and proposed hearing.

   A proceeding concerning a claimed recantation could draw renewed attention to the account at issue and to the sequence in which the allegations and later claim are considered.

8. Question 8 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What stance does the article adopt toward the underlying accounts?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Decisively accusatory
   2. Strongly exculpatory
   3. Cautious and noncommittal
   4. Openly dismissive of the hearing
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Cautious and noncommittal

   Its wording acknowledges uncertainty and refuses to endorse either account.

   Nor does the report indicate what consequences either account may ultimately have.

What to review next

Find the words that support each answer. For a mistake, compare the question with the evidence and identify the detail or inference you missed.

A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.

Before you practise: a worked example

Look for evidence in the text. Separate what the writer says from what you already know about the topic.

The library normally closes at six, but on Fridays it stays open until eight. When does it close on Friday?

The answer is eight. But introduces an exception to the normal closing time, so the first time mentioned is not the answer.

This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.