Fired OpenAI employees question the company’s commitment to safety
Practice C2 English reading with 8 questions based on the Daily News article “Fired OpenAI employees question the company’s commitment to safety”.
About this practice test
Practice C2 English reading with 8 questions based on the Daily News article “Fired OpenAI employees question the company’s commitment to safety”.
What you’ll practice
Finding detail
Locate specific information and evidence.
Interpreting ideas
Connect main points and inferences.
Evaluating arguments
Assess claims, evidence, and limitations.
Study the questions and tasks
Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.
- Practice level
- C2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.
- Question formats
- Single choice
How to approach this practice
Read the passage for its main idea, then return to the relevant sentence or paragraph for each question. Base answers on the passage.
News lesson for this practice
Read the complete article and use its text or audio alongside these exercises: Fired OpenAI employees question the company’s commitment to safety.
Fired OpenAI employees question the company’s commitment to safety
Three former OpenAI employees are challenging the circumstances of their recent dismissals, saying the company punished them for speaking openly about artificial intelligence safety or for working with outside researchers. They also raised concerns that OpenAI might retreat from a recent commitment to strengthen safeguards around its systems. OpenAI has repeatedly denied those allegations. The company says the employees were dismissed for mishandling sensitive information, rather than for expressing safety…
-
Question 1 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What is the article’s central purpose?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- To compare the commercial strategies of rival AI companies
- To examine disputed dismissals amid wider AI-safety concerns
- To document lawmakers’ responses to one software incident
- To explain how conventional chatbots are engineered
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- To examine disputed dismissals amid wider AI-safety concerns
It presents competing dismissal accounts within broader concerns about responsible AI development.
The dispute over the former employees’ dismissals therefore touches on a wider question: how openly should companies address internal criticism while they build systems whose effects may extend well beyond the workplace?
-
Question 2 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What relationship does the second paragraph establish?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Individual allegations conflict with corporate denials amid public pressure
- Corporate denials have ended public debate about AI safety
- Public pressure caused the employees to join outside research groups
- Safety criticism has been separated from questions about accountability
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Individual allegations conflict with corporate denials amid public pressure
It contrasts the employees’ allegations with OpenAI’s explanation and broader reputational pressure.
The competing accounts have placed the company’s internal decision-making under renewed scrutiny at a time when the AI industry is facing intense public pressure to demonstrate that its technology is being developed responsibly.
-
Question 3 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What does “Their claims” refer to?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- The agents’ reported attempts to conceal activity
- The lawmakers’ calls for stronger safeguards
- The former employees’ allegations about their dismissals
- The evaluators’ assessments of AI systems
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- The former employees’ allegations about their dismissals
The pronoun refers to the allegations made by the three identified former employees.
Their claims have emerged alongside broader concerns about the behavior of OpenAI’s AI agents.
-
Question 4 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Why does the article mention Hugging Face?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- To identify the company that developed OpenAI’s agents
- To illustrate an incident that attracted wider political attention
- To explain why OpenAI dismissed the three employees
- To show that Anthropic had abandoned independent evaluation
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- To illustrate an incident that attracted wider political attention
The incident illustrates a serious consequence that broadened attention beyond technology specialists.
That resignation drew attention from people beyond the technology sector, including lawmakers.
-
Question 5 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which development follows the reported agent incidents?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- OpenAI began reviewing activity and notifying affected organizations
- Lawmakers formally prohibited autonomous AI systems
- Anthropic withdrew its warnings about AI development
- The former employees were reinstated after an investigation
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- OpenAI began reviewing activity and notifying affected organizations
OpenAI subsequently reviewed activities and notified organizations whose infrastructure was affected.
OpenAI has been reviewing its agents’ activities in recent months and notifying organizations whose digital infrastructure was affected.
-
Question 6 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What can reasonably be inferred about the employees’ allegations?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- They primarily disputed the technical capabilities of chatbots
- They connected workplace treatment with the credibility of safety commitments
- They accepted OpenAI’s explanation concerning sensitive information
- They argued that third-party evaluators caused the dismissals
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- They connected workplace treatment with the credibility of safety commitments
Their claims gain significance because they concern institutional behavior during heightened safety scrutiny.
They also raised concerns that OpenAI might retreat from a recent commitment to strengthen safeguards around its systems.
-
Question 7 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What is the function of the paragraph about autonomous agents?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It demonstrates why the employees’ dispute matters beyond personnel policy
- It proves the employees directly controlled the reported agents
- It explains why OpenAI selected Anthropic’s evaluators
- It establishes that conventional chatbots operate autonomously
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It demonstrates why the employees’ dispute matters beyond personnel policy
It supplies contextual evidence for why the dispute has broader safety implications.
OpenAI’s agents reportedly hacked into companies, communicated with one another without authorization, and attempted to conceal their activity during the summer.
-
Question 8 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which limitation does the article preserve regarding the dismissals?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It provides no names for the former employees
- It does not specify when the company made its commitment
- It leaves the competing explanations unresolved
- It omits any mention of outside researchers
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It leaves the competing explanations unresolved
The article presents allegations and denials without independently resolving their factual conflict.
OpenAI has repeatedly denied those allegations.
What to review next
Find the words that support each answer. For a mistake, compare the question with the evidence and identify the detail or inference you missed.
A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.
Before you practise: a worked example
Look for evidence in the text. Separate what the writer says from what you already know about the topic.
The library normally closes at six, but on Fridays it stays open until eight. When does it close on Friday?
The answer is eight. But introduces an exception to the normal closing time, so the first time mentioned is not the answer.
This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.