Progress, Evidence and the Stories Institutions Tell
About this practice test
Explore how libraries, civic services and public institutions define progress, and how evidence can challenge official success stories. The tasks examine claims, limitations, bias, conditions and institutional perspectives.
What you’ll practice
Finding detail
Locate specific information and evidence.
Interpreting ideas
Connect main points and inferences.
Evaluating arguments
Assess claims, evidence, and limitations.
What to expect:
24 questions with explanations to review after submission.
Study the questions and tasks
Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.
- Practice level
- C2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.
- Question formats
- Single choice, Multiple choice, True / False / Not Given, Fill in the blank (text), Matching
How to approach this practice
Read the passage for its main idea, then return to the relevant sentence or paragraph for each question. Base answers on the passage.
Northgate Library and the Story of Progress
In the city of Northgate, the public library's 2023 reform was sold as a clean, forward-looking story. A new brochure showed bright shelves, a self-service wall and a smiling retiree at a laptop. The board promised to modernise access, widen readership and free staff for "higher-value work". In its public meetings, it described the project as a shift from an old model of gatekeeping to one of invitation. The language was neat, almost ceremonial: the library would not merely survive budget pressure; it would prove that public institutions could adapt without losing their civic purpose. The report from which this account is drawn does not deny that some things improved. It compares press releases with borrowing logs, door counts, brief interviews and ten weeks of observation before and after the change. Yet it asks what, exactly, counts as improvement. A rise in footfall is not the same as a rise in sustained use, and more card registrations do not automatically mean broader participation. The report therefore reads the reform as a test of narrative. It suggests that institutions tend to tell the most flattering version of a change when they can point to any measurable increase. On the surface, the numbers seemed to support the board. Footfall rose by 18 per cent in the first month, and Sunday afternoons became noticeably busier. But the report notes that much of the increase came from school groups, author talks and weekend craft sessions that had been added to the calendar at the same time. Once those events are separated out, the library's ordinary browsing traffic was flatter than the brochure implied. Borrowing of children's fiction climbed, while adult non-fiction stayed close to the earlier level. The board spoke of a general renaissance; the evidence described a more uneven pattern. The self-checkout kiosks were another favourite piece of the official story. Managers said they would release staff from repetitive tasks so that they could offer deeper help to visitors. That part was partly true, but not in the simple way advertised. Time at the circulation desk did fall, yet the freed minutes were quickly absorbed by wayfinding questions, printer failures and patient assistance for older patrons who found the screens awkward. Several staff members told the researchers that the building now required less stamping and more mediation. In other words, the work changed shape rather than disappearing. The largest contrast between narrative and evidence concerned the reading rooms. The board's design brief had praised an open-plan layout because, in its words, it would make the library feel "welcoming and fluid". The report agrees that the space felt more open, but it also records a less flattering consequence: the quieter corners that long-time users valued became busier and noisier, especially after lunch. Some regulars moved to early mornings; others simply stopped coming. The reform widened access in one sense, because newcomers felt less intimidated, but it narrowed concentration in another, because uninterrupted reading became harder to protect. A similar pattern appeared in the rearrangement of stock. Bestsellers were moved close to the entrance on the theory that visibility encourages discovery. The result was real, but selective. Impulse borrowing rose, particularly among casual visitors who had come for another reason and left with a novel. At the same time, the local history shelves, now deeper inside the building, were consulted less often. The report does not suggest that the board intended this outcome. Rather, it argues that the word "discovery" was doing quiet ideological work: it made a trade-off between convenience and diversity sound like an uncomplicated gain. Equity claims were the board's boldest. It pointed to the increase in new library cards as proof that the reform had reached people who had previously stayed away. The report answers with a sharper distinction. Most new cards belonged to temporary accounts issued to students at the nearby college, who were already heavy users of the building's study tables. The group that remained hardest to reach was adults with irregular working hours, especially those who depended on buses that did not always align with Sunday opening. For them, the new timetable helped sometimes, but only when the transport system cooperated. The report ends without romantic pessimism. It does not say the reform failed, nor does it accept the board's triumphal tone. Instead, it insists that public institutions often convert partial evidence into a story of universal benefit. Northgate Library did become easier to enter, and in some respects easier to use. But the reform also redistributed inconvenience, visibility and attention. The most useful question, the report argues, is not whether the library became modern. It is for whom it became modern, under what conditions, and at whose expense the gains were achieved. That question, the report implies, is less flattering than a slogan, but far more accurate.
Mara Elson's Brief on the Briar Gate Appointment Reform
At Briar Gate Civic Office, Mara Elson led a short methods brief on a reform that let residents with missed appointments reschedule by text message and through a single online form. The reform was meant to reduce empty slots and to make re-entry into the system less humiliating after a no-show. It started at three sites and, if early signs were convincing, was due to expand later. Even before the first figures arrived, the team agreed that the reform would be easier to describe than to judge, because the organisation was changing while the evaluation itself was still being designed. The first limitation was selection. The three sites were not chosen because they were the most typical centres; they were the ones whose managers volunteered quickly and already kept cleaner records. Two similar centres were left out because their software could not export data in the same format. That made any simple comparison fragile. A site with a disciplined manager can look successful before the new procedure has done much at all, and a site with poor records can look weak even after improvement. The brief therefore warned against reading site-by-site differences as if they were proof of the reform's effect. A second problem was timing. While the new reminders were being introduced, the council also changed bus timetables and removed a parking subsidy near one centre. Staff on the ground were quick to attribute better attendance to the reform, but the brief treated such confidence as a narrative, not evidence. When several changes occur together, a rise or fall in attendance may reflect any of them, or the combination, and a method that cannot separate those influences should say so plainly. The team wrote that the reform might still matter, but not in a way the available design could isolate. The evidence base itself was mixed. The appointment database was the fullest source, yet it was useful only as a map of attendance, not as proof of changed behaviour. Interviews with caseworkers added texture but also bias, because people who speak often in meetings are not necessarily those most affected. The brief contrasted 'what the records can show' with 'what the stories can suggest'. This was not a rejection of narrative; rather, it was a reminder that stories travel further than their certainty. A sympathetic account from one clinic could illuminate a pattern, but it could not by itself establish the size of the change. The user survey produced another caution. Only 38 per cent of recipients replied, and the replies skewed towards people who already used text messaging without difficulty. Residents with unstable phone numbers, shared devices or limited credit were harder to reach and therefore less visible in the results. The team did not claim these residents were absent from the reform's impact; it said only that the survey could not confidently represent them. In practice, this meant the most convenient voices were also the loudest in the data. The brief also noted that short follow-up can flatter a reform. During the first six weeks, staff enthusiasm was high, messages were sent on time and no one had yet grown tired of the new process. That early discipline could make a reform look cleaner than it would look after ordinary routines returned. The team therefore resisted the common institutional habit of calling a promising opening 'proof of momentum'. They preferred the plainer phrase 'an encouraging start', because it leaves room for later disappointment without pretending that disappointment has already arrived. There were, nevertheless, some signs that justified attention. At the three participating sites, missed appointments fell more sharply among residents who had previously missed at least two bookings in a year, and staff reported fewer empty waiting rooms on reminder days. Yet the brief was careful not to overstate this as a universal gain. The largest improvement appeared where reception staff also spent time calling people who had not replied to the text. That made the result useful but conditional: the reform worked best when technology was paired with human follow-up. Remove the follow-up, and the effect might shrink. In its closing section, the team summed up the problem with a sentence that sounded almost dry, though it was carrying a good deal of judgment: the evaluation could describe a shift, but it could not fully attribute that shift. Institutions often prefer cleaner stories, because clean stories travel well in committee papers and press releases. The brief did not dismiss progress; it asked readers to notice what had been left out of the account and what sort of confidence the missing pieces would allow. That, more than a headline percentage, was the point of the exercise.
The Civic Ledger and the Six Voices of Progress
Paragraph 1At Westmere House, a civic forum called the Ledger gathered six institutional leaders to answer a question that sounded neat but quickly turned slippery: what does progress really mean? The organiser expected praise for targets, dashboards, and reputational wins. Instead, the evening moved through scenes from daily administration: a clinic waiting room, a museum shelf, a flooded bus route, a classroom dispute, an archive search, and a resident-run housing block. Though the programme was divided into three exchanges, the speakers kept interrupting one another's assumptions. What startled the audience was not only disagreement, but the fact that every speaker treated progress as something judged through lived experience rather than ceremonial success.
Paragraph 2Mara Ilyas, who ran the North Quay clinic, rejected the usual language of medical triumph. A clinic, she said, could celebrate a new scanner, a refined brand, and faster access to specialists while still neglecting the work that mattered most. For her, genuine improvement was not dramatic rescue but earlier help. “If our waiting room is quieter because the neighbourhood is healthier, the silence is achievement,” she said. Her standard was that fewer people should arrive frightened and late because advice, screening, and access had already prevented problems from escalating. In her view, an institution that praised rescue alone had mistaken technical brilliance for public value.
Paragraph 3Tomas Velez, the museum curator, argued that progress did not mean a larger collection or a grander building, because scale could hide carelessness. “An institution is not growing up merely because its shelves are fuller,” he said. A museum, he said, grows up when it can explain what it has returned, what it has removed, and what it now suspects it once labelled too confidently. In his account, honest absence mattered more than ceremonial possession.
Paragraph 4Imani Okafor, who managed the city transit network, distrusted glossy launch-day language. She knew passengers remembered the week a route failed in heavy rain far more vividly than any ribbon-cutting ceremony. “A timetable that only works in calm weather is a decoration,” she said. To her, progress meant buses and trains still functioning when software failed, roads flooded, or crews were short. The true test was not whether an upgrade looked modern in a brochure, but whether an ordinary commuter could still get home when conditions turned unfriendly.
Paragraph 5Leo Merton, head teacher of Dockside School, described a subtler danger: confusing silence with health. A school that suppresses complaints to preserve order has not become wiser, only tidier. Students should be able to challenge decisions, question rules, and criticise teaching without being made to feel like intruders. “Trust is not the absence of argument; it is the confidence that argument will not be punished,” he said. For him, progress meant creating a place where disagreement did not end belonging.
Paragraph 6Sofia Nair, who directed the municipal archive, was suspicious of claims that digitisation by itself represented advance. She had seen projects that turned paper into files without making either the files or the history any more usable. “A very expensive way to move boxes into cloud storage,” she called it, if the records could not be searched, cited, or legally used. For Sofia, progress meant memory becoming more shareable, not merely more remote. Otherwise, the institution had changed its packaging while leaving the old barriers intact.
Paragraph 7Nikhil Rao, who managed a housing cooperative on the east side, made the most openly political claim of the evening. He said progress in housing could not be judged by the number of units alone, because a landlord might build more flats while keeping every major decision distant from the people inside them. Residents, in his view, had to be able to alter rules, schedule repairs, and reject decorative schemes that consumed money without improving life. “If people are merely housed but never heard, progress has stopped at the front door,” he said.
Paragraph 8The forum ended without a single metric to settle the matter, and that may have been the point. The speakers did not dismiss measurement; they disputed what ought to be measured. Delay, disappearance, reliability, voice, access, and power were not alternatives to progress but the conditions under which the word could still mean something other than self-congratulation. In that sense, the most advanced institution might be the one least tempted to narrate its own growth as proof of virtue.
-
Question 1 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What is the report's overall assessment of Northgate Library's reform?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It argues that the reform was mostly cosmetic and left ordinary use unchanged.
- It recommends reversing the reform because the library became less public.
- It concludes that the board intentionally falsified all of its statistics.
- It says the reform produced some genuine gains, but the official story made them sound universal.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It says the reform produced some genuine gains, but the official story made them sound universal.
The report says the reform produced real gains, but the board turned partial evidence into a story of universal benefit. It is not claiming that every statistic was false, and it does not recommend reversing modernisation altogether.
The report ends without romantic pessimism
public institutions often convert partial evidence into a story of universal benefit
It argues that the reform was mostly cosmetic and left ordinary use unchanged.: The report records several genuine changes, including easier access and some improved borrowing patterns.
It recommends reversing the reform because the library became less public.: The report is critical, but it does not call for a return to the old model.
It concludes that the board intentionally falsified all of its statistics.: The report criticises selective framing, not proven fraud or invented numbers.
It says the reform produced some genuine gains, but the official story made them sound universal.: This matches the report's conclusion that partial improvements were overstated as broad success.
-
Question 2 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What mainly accounted for the rise in footfall in the first month?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- The entrance redesign alone doubled ordinary browsing traffic.
- School groups, author talks and weekend craft sessions made the building busier.
- More card registrations were the main reason the library became crowded.
- The new self-checkout kiosks drew many more visitors to the building.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- School groups, author talks and weekend craft sessions made the building busier.
The report says the increase was largely due to added events such as school groups, author talks and weekend craft sessions. The other options are mentioned as part of the reform, but they are not identified as the main reason for the footfall rise.
much of the increase came from school groups, author talks and weekend craft sessions
Footfall rose by 18 per cent in the first month
The entrance redesign alone doubled ordinary browsing traffic.: The report specifically says ordinary browsing traffic was flatter than the brochure implied.
School groups, author talks and weekend craft sessions made the building busier.: This is the explanation the report gives for much of the increase.
More card registrations were the main reason the library became crowded.: Registrations are discussed later as an equity claim, not as the driver of the first-month footfall rise.
The new self-checkout kiosks drew many more visitors to the building.: The kiosks affected staff work, but the report does not attribute the footfall rise to them.
-
Question 3 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What did the report say happened to staff time after self-checkout was introduced?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Staff spent less time helping visitors overall and could focus mainly on programming.
- The circulation desk became busier because the kiosks were confusing to everyone.
- The freed time was absorbed by wayfinding questions, printer failures and help for older patrons.
- Self-checkout removed the need for any human assistance at the library.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- The freed time was absorbed by wayfinding questions, printer failures and help for older patrons.
The report says self-checkout reduced time at the circulation desk, but that time was quickly taken up by other kinds of help. It therefore changed the shape of staff work rather than eliminating it.
Time at the circulation desk did fall
the freed minutes were quickly absorbed by wayfinding questions, printer failures and patient assistance for older patrons
Staff spent less time helping visitors overall and could focus mainly on programming.: The report describes the opposite: staff help shifted into other forms, rather than disappearing.
The circulation desk became busier because the kiosks were confusing to everyone.: The report does not say all visitors were confused; it says the work changed shape.
The freed time was absorbed by wayfinding questions, printer failures and help for older patrons.: This is the report's account of how staff work changed after the kiosks arrived.
Self-checkout removed the need for any human assistance at the library.: The report explicitly shows that human assistance remained necessary.
-
Question 4 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What does the report imply about the open-plan reading rooms?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- They made uninterrupted reading easier for long-time users without affecting newcomers.
- They mainly increased borrowing by moving fiction closer to the entrance.
- They were rejected by almost everyone because the library became too formal.
- They felt more welcoming to newcomers but made quiet reading harder for some regulars.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- They felt more welcoming to newcomers but made quiet reading harder for some regulars.
The report accepts that the rooms felt more open and welcoming to newcomers, but it also shows that quiet reading became harder for some regular users. The best answer captures both sides of that trade-off.
the space felt more open
the quieter corners that long-time users valued became busier and noisier
They made uninterrupted reading easier for long-time users without affecting newcomers.: The report says the opposite: quiet concentration became harder to protect.
They mainly increased borrowing by moving fiction closer to the entrance.: That effect belongs to the stock rearrangement, not the reading-room layout.
They were rejected by almost everyone because the library became too formal.: The report notes greater openness, not widespread rejection for being formal.
They felt more welcoming to newcomers but made quiet reading harder for some regulars.: This combines the report's positive and negative judgments about the redesign.
-
Question 5 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Why does the report say the word 'discovery' was doing quiet ideological work?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It made a trade-off between convenience and diversity sound like an uncomplicated gain.
- It referred to a formal policy that required every shelf to be rearranged.
- It proved that readers had stopped caring about local history shelves.
- It showed that moving bestsellers near the entrance reduced all borrowing.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It made a trade-off between convenience and diversity sound like an uncomplicated gain.
The report argues that 'discovery' helped present a genuine trade-off as if it were only a win. It made the gain in visibility sound simple, while the loss of diversity was being hidden.
the word "discovery" was doing quiet ideological work
it made a trade-off between convenience and diversity sound like an uncomplicated gain
It made a trade-off between convenience and diversity sound like an uncomplicated gain.: This is exactly the criticism made in the report.
It referred to a formal policy that required every shelf to be rearranged.: The report is discussing the language of justification, not a written rule with that name.
It proved that readers had stopped caring about local history shelves.: The report says local history was consulted less often, but not that readers no longer cared at all.
It showed that moving bestsellers near the entrance reduced all borrowing.: The report says impulse borrowing rose, so borrowing did not simply decline.
-
Question 6 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
According to the report, which group remained hardest to reach after the reform?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Older patrons who disliked using screens.
- Students at the nearby college.
- Adults with irregular working hours.
- School groups visiting on weekdays.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Adults with irregular working hours.
The report identifies adults with irregular working hours as the group still least well served. Students benefited from new cards, and older patrons are mentioned for different reasons, but they are not named as the hardest group to reach.
The group that remained hardest to reach was adults with irregular working hours
especially those who depended on buses that did not always align with Sunday opening
Older patrons who disliked using screens.: Older patrons needed extra help, but they are not identified as the hardest-to-reach group overall.
Students at the nearby college.: Students are described as the majority of new cardholders, so they were not the hardest group to reach.
Adults with irregular working hours.: This is the group the report names as still hardest to reach.
School groups visiting on weekdays.: School groups helped increase footfall, but they are not presented as an excluded audience.
-
Question 7 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What question does the report present as the most useful way to judge the reform?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Whether the board acted with good intentions in approving the reform.
- For whom it became modern, under what conditions, and at whose expense the gains were achieved.
- How far the library's new services attracted more school groups.
- Whether the reform should be cancelled because it changed the building too much.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- For whom it became modern, under what conditions, and at whose expense the gains were achieved.
The report says the key issue is not simply whether the library became modern. It asks who benefited, under what conditions, and at whose expense. The other options are too broad, too accusatory, or too narrow.
The most useful question, the report argues, is not whether the library became modern
It is for whom it became modern, under what conditions, and at whose expense the gains were achieved
Whether the board acted with good intentions in approving the reform.: Intentions are not the report's main criterion; it focuses on effects and distribution.
For whom it became modern, under what conditions, and at whose expense the gains were achieved.: This is the report's explicit final question and its main evaluative standard.
How far the library's new services attracted more school groups.: School groups are only one part of the evidence and do not capture the report's central judgment.
Whether the reform should be cancelled because it changed the building too much.: The report does not recommend cancellation; it asks for a more exact form of evaluation.
-
Question 8 · Multiple choice
Choose all the correct answers.
Choose TWO findings supported by the report about the reform.
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Impulse borrowing rose after bestsellers were moved near the entrance.
- The self-checkout kiosks eliminated the need for staff assistance at the circulation desk.
- Most new library cards were issued to students at the nearby college.
- Sunday opening solved the transport problems for adults with irregular working hours.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Impulse borrowing rose after bestsellers were moved near the entrance.; Most new library cards were issued to students at the nearby college.
The report explicitly says that impulse borrowing rose after bestsellers were moved near the entrance, and that most new cards belonged to students at the nearby college. The other two statements contradict the text: staff were still needed, and Sunday opening did not solve transport problems.
Impulse borrowing rose
Most new cards belonged to temporary accounts issued to students at the nearby college
Impulse borrowing rose after bestsellers were moved near the entrance.: The report states this directly as a result of the stock rearrangement.
The self-checkout kiosks eliminated the need for staff assistance at the circulation desk.: The report says staff time shifted into other kinds of help, so this is contradicted.
Most new library cards were issued to students at the nearby college.: This is another direct finding in the report's discussion of equity claims.
Sunday opening solved the transport problems for adults with irregular working hours.: The report says the timetable helped only when transport cooperated, so the problem was not solved.
-
Question 9 · True / False / Not Given
Decide whether the statement agrees with the information. Choose Not Given when the text or recording does not provide the information.
The reform was initially introduced at three sites.
Return to the passage, recording or visual- True
- False
- Not Given
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- True
True. The passage says, "It started at three sites," and explains that expansion would depend on convincing early signs. The limited initial rollout is therefore stated directly.
It started at three sites
if early signs were convincing, was due to expand later
-
Question 10 · True / False / Not Given
Decide whether the statement agrees with the information. Choose Not Given when the text or recording does not provide the information.
The participating sites were chosen because their managers volunteered quickly and already kept cleaner records.
Return to the passage, recording or visual- True
- False
- Not Given
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- True
True. The passage says the sites 'were the ones whose managers volunteered quickly and already kept cleaner records.' That is exactly the reason for their selection, so False is contradicted and Not Given is unnecessary.
they were the ones whose managers volunteered quickly and already kept cleaner records
-
Question 11 · True / False / Not Given
Decide whether the statement agrees with the information. Choose Not Given when the text or recording does not provide the information.
The brief states the ages of the people who replied to the survey.
Return to the passage, recording or visual- True
- False
- Not Given
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Not Given
Not Given. The passage gives the response rate and says the replies skewed towards people who already used text messaging without difficulty, but it never mentions age. False would require the text to contradict the claim, which it does not.
Only 38 per cent of recipients replied
the replies skewed towards people who already used text messaging without difficulty
-
Question 12 · True / False / Not Given
Decide whether the statement agrees with the information. Choose Not Given when the text or recording does not provide the information.
The survey responses were skewed toward residents who already used text messaging without difficulty.
Return to the passage, recording or visual- True
- False
- Not Given
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- True
True. The passage says the replies 'skewed towards people who already used text messaging without difficulty.' That matches the statement. False would reverse the direction of the bias, and Not Given is incorrect because the survey skew is stated directly.
the replies skewed towards people who already used text messaging without difficulty
Residents with unstable phone numbers, shared devices or limited credit were harder to reach
-
Question 13 · True / False / Not Given
Decide whether the statement agrees with the information. Choose Not Given when the text or recording does not provide the information.
The brief says interviews provided the fullest evidence for judging the reform’s effect.
Return to the passage, recording or visual- True
- False
- Not Given
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- False
False. The brief identifies the appointment database as its fullest source, while interviews added texture and bias. The statement gives the fullest-source role to interviews instead of the database.
The appointment database was the fullest source
Interviews with caseworkers added texture but also bias
-
Question 14 · True / False / Not Given
Decide whether the statement agrees with the information. Choose Not Given when the text or recording does not provide the information.
The brief says the changes to bus timetables and parking subsidy could be ignored when comparing attendance.
Return to the passage, recording or visual- True
- False
- Not Given
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- False
False. The passage says the council 'also changed bus timetables and removed a parking subsidy,' and then explains that such changes make it hard to separate causes. So they cannot be ignored. True is contradicted, and Not Given is wrong because the issue is directly addressed.
the council also changed bus timetables and removed a parking subsidy near one centre
a method that cannot separate those influences should say so plainly
-
Question 15 · True / False / Not Given
Decide whether the statement agrees with the information. Choose Not Given when the text or recording does not provide the information.
The reform was made permanent after the first six weeks of monitoring.
Return to the passage, recording or visual- True
- False
- Not Given
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Not Given
Not Given. The passage mentions 'During the first six weeks' and describes an 'encouraging start,' but it never says the reform was made permanent. False would require the text to say it was not made permanent, which it does not.
They preferred the plainer phrase 'an encouraging start', because it leaves room for later disappointment without pretending that disappointment has already arrived
-
Question 16 · Fill in the blank (text)
Complete each blank with the missing word or phrase.
Write NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS AND/OR A NUMBER from the passage. The appointment database was useful, but only as a map of ___, not as proof of changed behaviour.
Return to the passage, recording or visualCheck answers and explanations
- Blank 1
- attendance
The missing word is 'attendance'. The passage says the database 'was useful only as a map of attendance, not as proof of changed behaviour.' Other possibilities such as 'impact' or 'outcomes' are too broad and do not match the wording used in the text.
The appointment database was the fullest source, yet it was useful only as a map of attendance, not as proof of changed behaviour
-
Question 17 · Matching
Match each item to the correct choice.
Match each commentator with the principle of progress most closely associated with their remarks.
Return to the passage, recording or visualAnswer choices
- Progress means records become searchable and usable.
- Progress means fewer crises because help comes earlier.
- Progress means disagreement can happen without punishment.
- Progress means being able to explain why the institution returned or removed things.
- Progress means residents share decisions about their homes.
- Progress means service still works under pressure.
- Progress means expanding the institution's visible scale.
Items
- Mara Ilyas
- Tomas Velez
- Imani Okafor
- Leo Merton
- Sofia Nair
- Nikhil Rao
Check answers and explanations
- 1. Mara Ilyas
- Progress means fewer crises because help comes earlier.
- 2. Tomas Velez
- Progress means being able to explain why the institution returned or removed things.
- 3. Imani Okafor
- Progress means service still works under pressure.
- 4. Leo Merton
- Progress means disagreement can happen without punishment.
- 5. Sofia Nair
- Progress means records become searchable and usable.
- 6. Nikhil Rao
- Progress means residents share decisions about their homes.
Match 1: Mara Ilyas links progress with earlier help that prevents crises from escalating. Match 2: Tomas Velez associates maturity with explaining what the museum has returned, removed, or relabelled. Match 3: Imani Okafor judges progress by whether transport continues working under difficult conditions. Match 4: Leo Merton says trust requires disagreement without punishment. Match 5: Sofia Nair requires records to become searchable, citable, and usable. Match 6: Nikhil Rao says residents must have influence over decisions affecting their homes. Option G is unused because the speakers repeatedly question visible institutional growth as a measure of progress.
Her standard was that fewer people should arrive frightened and late because advice, screening, and access had already prevented problems from escalating
A museum, he said, grows up when it can explain what it has returned, what it has removed, and what it now suspects it once labelled too confidently
Delay, disappearance, reliability, voice, access, and power were not alternatives to progress but the conditions under which the word could still mean something other than self-congratulation
-
Question 18 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What does Mara Ilyas mean by saying that a clinic can mistake "technical brilliance" for "public value"?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It may value its brand only when it cannot offer faster specialist access.
- It may admire high-profile treatment while failing to reduce preventable crises in time.
- It may become so quiet that staff overlook illness in the neighbourhood.
- It may send too many patients to specialists instead of using its new scanner.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It may admire high-profile treatment while failing to reduce preventable crises in time.
The correct answer is the one saying a clinic may admire impressive treatment while failing to prevent avoidable crises early enough. Mara's contrast is not between good and bad medicine, but between dramatic rescue and public benefit. She argues that scanners, branding, and specialist access can look impressive while the more valuable work is earlier advice, screening, and access that stop people arriving frightened and late. The other options distort her point by focusing on equipment, on quietness by itself, or on an impossible rejection of specialists.
A clinic, she said, could celebrate a new scanner, a refined brand, and faster access to specialists while still neglecting the work that mattered most
Her standard was that fewer people should arrive frightened and late because advice, screening, and access had already prevented problems from escalating
In her view, an institution that praised rescue alone had mistaken technical brilliance for public value
-
Question 19 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What broader principle about institutional maturity is Tomas Velez advancing?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Maturity is shown by maximizing how much the public can see at one time.
- Returning objects matters mainly because it frees space for future acquisitions.
- Progress is shown by honest explanation and correction, not fuller shelves alone.
- Museums mature by retaining confident labels that help visitors trust the continuity of their collections.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Progress is shown by honest explanation and correction, not fuller shelves alone.
The correct answer is the one about honest explanation and correction rather than visible accumulation. Tomas says a museum matures when it can explain what it has returned, removed, or previously labelled too confidently. The other options prioritise scale, storage, or unchanging labels, which his remarks question.
A museum, he said, grows up when it can explain what it has returned, what it has removed, and what it now suspects it once labelled too confidently
In his account, honest absence mattered more than ceremonial possession
Museums mature by retaining confident labels that help visitors trust the continuity of their collections.: Tomas values acknowledging earlier overconfidence and explaining returns or removals, rather than keeping labels fixed.
-
Question 20 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
For Imani Okafor, what exposes the weakness of many celebrated transport upgrades?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- They are often designed to impress at launch rather than to endure disruption.
- They prioritise emergency capacity so heavily that routine passengers see too little everyday improvement.
- They maintain old operating practices because passengers resist experiments with more resilient services.
- They retain printed information despite passengers’ clear preference for dependable digital communication.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- They are often designed to impress at launch rather than to endure disruption.
The correct answer is the one that contrasts launch-day image with performance under strain. Imani distrusts glossy announcements because passengers remember breakdowns in bad conditions, not publicity. Her standard is resilience: the system must keep serving ordinary commuters when weather, software, or staffing problems hit. The other options mention issues not central to her argument or invert her priorities by treating appearance as more important than endurance.
Imani Okafor, who managed the city transit network, distrusted glossy launch-day language
She knew passengers remembered the week a route failed in heavy rain far more vividly than any ribbon-cutting ceremony
The true test was not whether an upgrade looked modern in a brochure, but whether an ordinary commuter could still get home when conditions turned unfriendly
They prioritise emergency capacity so heavily that routine passengers see too little everyday improvement.: Imani criticises impressive launches that fail under disruption, rather than excessive attention to emergency capacity.
They maintain old operating practices because passengers resist experiments with more resilient services.: The passage does not attribute the problem to passengers resisting resilience.
They retain printed information despite passengers’ clear preference for dependable digital communication.: Imani's concern is dependable service under failure, rather than replacing print with digital publicity.
-
Question 21 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Leo Merton's warning against "confusing silence with health" implies that which situation can falsely look like progress?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- A school encourages frequent argument because conflict alone proves trust.
- A school appears orderly because students are afraid to challenge it.
- A school revises a disputed rule after inviting criticism from students and teachers.
- A school handles complaints privately so lessons continue without interruption.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- A school appears orderly because students are afraid to challenge it.
The correct answer is the one describing a calm-looking school where students learn that dissent threatens their belonging. Leo says suppressed complaints may produce tidiness, but not wisdom or trust. For him, genuine trust means disagreement can happen without punishment. The other options either endorse managed silence, overstate the value of argument for its own sake, or wrongly suggest that trust depends on accepting unchallengeable authority.
A school that suppresses complaints to preserve order has not become wiser, only tidier
Trust is not the absence of argument; it is the confidence that argument will not be punished,” he said
For him, progress meant creating a place where disagreement did not end belonging
A school revises a disputed rule after inviting criticism from students and teachers.: Inviting criticism and reconsidering rules reflects openness, rather than order maintained through fear.
-
Question 22 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What, for Sofia Nair, is wrong with treating digitisation itself as progress?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It can repackage records without making them easier to find, cite, or use.
- It can make physical originals less secure when repeated handling follows wider publicity.
- It can privilege anonymous users over the specialists responsible for maintaining the collections.
- It can confuse public access with permission for users to rewrite the archived records.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It can repackage records without making them easier to find, cite, or use.
The correct answer is the one saying digitisation can repackage records without making them more usable. Sofia is not attacking technology itself; she is attacking the assumption that conversion equals access. Her test is whether records can be searched, cited, legally used, and reached by people who were once blocked. The other options invent claims she does not make about paper being legally superior, public access being undesirable, or duplication being impossible.
She had seen projects that turned paper into files without making either the files or the history any more usable
For Sofia, progress meant memory becoming more shareable, not merely more remote
Otherwise, the institution had changed its packaging while leaving the old barriers intact
It can make physical originals less secure when repeated handling follows wider publicity.: Sofia's criticism concerns unusable digital records, rather than handling damage caused by publicity.
It can privilege anonymous users over the specialists responsible for maintaining the collections.: Sofia wants memory to be more shareable, rather than to protect specialists from wider access.
It can confuse public access with permission for users to rewrite the archived records.: Sofia discusses finding, citing and legally using records, rather than public editing of them.
-
Question 23 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What is central to Nikhil Rao's standard of housing progress?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Expanding the housing stock is the decisive measure, regardless of who controls it.
- Attractive upgrades from management can justify keeping decisions centralized.
- Lower costs matter more than whether tenants can challenge how the building is run.
- Residents must help shape rules, repairs and communal spending.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Residents must help shape rules, repairs and communal spending.
The correct answer is the one about residents having real influence over rules and spending. Nikhil argues that housing cannot be judged by unit numbers alone if decisions remain distant from those who live there. His focus is power inside the institution, not merely supply, appearance, or even affordability by itself. The other options all keep decision-making above residents, which is exactly what he objects to.
He said progress in housing could not be judged by the number of units alone, because a landlord might build more flats while keeping every major decision distant from the people inside them
Residents, in his view, had to be able to alter rules, schedule repairs, and reject decorative schemes that consumed money without improving life
If people are merely housed but never heard, progress has stopped at the front door,” he said
Expanding the housing stock is the decisive measure, regardless of who controls it.: Nikhil explicitly rejects judging housing progress by the number of units alone.
-
Question 24 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Which statement best captures the forum's final view of institutional progress?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Progress is visible in modern appearances that restore confidence in institutional leadership.
- Progress resists measurement, so institutions should trust compelling narratives rather than contested indicators.
- Progress becomes meaningful once institutions translate their expansion into polished accounts of collective achievement.
- Progress is what improves people's practical access, reliability, voice, and power.
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Progress is what improves people's practical access, reliability, voice, and power.
The correct answer is the one linking progress to practical improvements in people's lives and institutional accountability. The forum does not reject measurement; it argues that delay, reliability, access, voice, and power are more meaningful measures than appearance or growth alone. The other options either reduce progress to image and size or wrongly dismiss measurement altogether.
The speakers did not dismiss measurement; they disputed what ought to be measured
Delay, disappearance, reliability, voice, access, and power were not alternatives to progress but the conditions under which the word could still mean something other than self-congratulation
In that sense, the most advanced institution might be the one least tempted to narrate its own growth as proof of virtue
Progress is visible in modern appearances that restore confidence in institutional leadership.: The speakers test practical public value, rather than modern appearances and reputational success.
Progress resists measurement, so institutions should trust compelling narratives rather than contested indicators.: The speakers do not dismiss measurement; they dispute what should be measured.
Progress becomes meaningful once institutions translate their expansion into polished accounts of collective achievement.: The conclusion questions institutions narrating their own growth as proof of virtue.
What to review next
Find the words that support each answer. For a mistake, compare the question with the evidence and identify the detail or inference you missed.
A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.
Before you practise: a worked example
Look for evidence in the text. Separate what the writer says from what you already know about the topic.
The library normally closes at six, but on Fridays it stays open until eight. When does it close on Friday?
The answer is eight. But introduces an exception to the normal closing time, so the first time mentioned is not the answer.
This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.