“I’ve never seen anything like this” — A U.S. doctor treats Ebola’s youngest victims
About this practice test
Practice C1 English reading with 7 questions based on the Daily News article ““I’ve never seen anything like this” — A U.S. doctor treats Ebola’s youngest victims”.
What you’ll practice
Finding detail
Locate specific information and evidence.
Interpreting ideas
Connect main points and inferences.
Evaluating arguments
Assess claims, evidence, and limitations.
Study the questions and tasks
Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.
- Practice level
- C1. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.
- Question formats
- Single choice
How to approach this practice
Read the passage for its main idea, then return to the relevant sentence or paragraph for each question. Base answers on the passage.
News lesson for this practice
Read the complete article and use its text or audio alongside these exercises: “I’ve never seen anything like this” — A U.S. doctor treats Ebola’s youngest victims.
“I’ve never seen anything like this” — A U.S. doctor treats Ebola’s youngest victims
A report from NPR focuses on a U.S. doctor treating Ebola’s youngest victims, placing children at the center of a story about a serious infectious disease. Its title conveys the doctor’s impression that the experience is unlike anything previously encountered, while the report is framed around medical care for especially young patients. The subject is significant because children are not incidental figures in this account. They are explicitly identified as…
-
Question 1 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What is the article’s primary purpose?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- To explain Ebola’s epidemiology in detail
- To summarize a focused human-centered medical report
- To evaluate international outbreak policies
- To describe specific treatment procedures
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- To summarize a focused human-centered medical report
The article defines the report’s focus while carefully limiting unsupported conclusions.
For readers, the central takeaway is consequently precise rather than expansive.
-
Question 2 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Why is the doctor’s perspective central to the report?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- The doctor collected epidemiological data
- The doctor directly cared for affected children
- The doctor identified the outbreak’s location
- The doctor documented treatment outcomes
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- The doctor directly cared for affected children
The report presents the disease through someone directly involved in care.
By concentrating on the doctor’s work, the report presents the disease through the perspective of a medical professional directly involved in caring for the affected children.
-
Question 3 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What can readers reasonably infer about the article’s evidentiary stance?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It is deliberately cautious
- It is openly skeptical of doctors
- It assumes clinical outcomes
- It prioritizes speculation
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It is deliberately cautious
The wording distinguishes verified information from claims the package cannot establish.
However, the title alone does not establish why the cases were unprecedented, how the patients’ conditions developed, or what outcomes followed their treatment.
-
Question 4 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What does “Those details” refer to?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- The report’s publication date
- The doctor’s emotional reaction
- Location and additional patient-related information
- The children’s status as victims
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Location and additional patient-related information
The phrase points back to the omitted identifying and clinical information.
Those details therefore remain outside the scope of this factual summary.
-
Question 5 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
How is the article organized overall?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Chronologically, from outbreak to recovery
- Argumentatively, from claim to rebuttal
- Thematically, from focus to evidentiary boundaries
- Procedurally, from diagnosis to treatment
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Thematically, from focus to evidentiary boundaries
It moves from focus and significance to limits, interpretation, and takeaway.
The verified facts point to a human-centered account of caring for children affected by Ebola.
-
Question 6 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What relationship does the article establish between vulnerability and treatment?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- They are presented as unrelated concerns
- Vulnerability explains the treatment story’s human focus
- Treatment is portrayed as causing vulnerability
- Vulnerability is discussed only epidemiologically
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Vulnerability explains the treatment story’s human focus
It identifies pediatric vulnerability as directly connected to the treatment focus.
The available information establishes a focused connection between pediatric vulnerability and Ebola treatment.
-
Question 7 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Why does the article emphasize what remains unknown?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- To undermine the report’s credibility
- To prevent overinterpretation
- To conceal the doctor’s identity
- To question the publication date
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- To prevent overinterpretation
The limitations prevent readers from extending the verified facts into unsupported claims.
It supports understanding who is being treated and why the doctor’s perspective is central, but it does not support broader claims about the outbreak or the wider medical response.
What to review next
Find the words that support each answer. For a mistake, compare the question with the evidence and identify the detail or inference you missed.
A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.
Before you practise: a worked example
Look for evidence in the text. Separate what the writer says from what you already know about the topic.
The library normally closes at six, but on Fridays it stays open until eight. When does it close on Friday?
The answer is eight. But introduces an exception to the normal closing time, so the first time mentioned is not the answer.
This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.