Text Message Referencing ‘Hijack’ Forces United Flight to Return to Las Vegas
Practice B2 English reading with 7 questions based on the Daily News article “Text Message Referencing ‘Hijack’ Forces United Flight to Return to Las Vegas”.
About this practice test
Practice B2 English reading with 7 questions based on the Daily News article “Text Message Referencing ‘Hijack’ Forces United Flight to Return to Las Vegas”.
What you’ll practice
Finding detail
Locate specific information and evidence.
Interpreting ideas
Connect main points and inferences.
Evaluating arguments
Assess claims, evidence, and limitations.
Study the questions and tasks
Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.
- Practice level
- B2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.
- Question formats
- Single choice
How to approach this practice
Read the passage for its main idea, then return to the relevant sentence or paragraph for each question. Base answers on the passage.
News lesson for this practice
Read the complete article and use its text or audio alongside these exercises: Text Message Referencing ‘Hijack’ Forces United Flight to Return to Las Vegas.
Text Message Referencing ‘Hijack’ Forces United Flight to Return to Las Vegas
A United flight returned to Las Vegas after a passenger sent a text message that referred to a hijack. The passenger has since been charged with a felony. The passenger said he had been drinking before sending the message. He later described the text as poorly worded banter between co-workers. His explanation presents the message as part of an informal exchange, but the reference to a hijack had already caused…
-
Question 1 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What is the article mainly intended to explain?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- How airlines train passengers to write messages
- Why one message caused serious consequences despite its claimed intent
- Why workplace banter is usually illegal
- How aircraft hijacking investigations are completed
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Why one message caused serious consequences despite its claimed intent
It explains how one message produced serious aviation and legal consequences.
Rather, it shows that the wording of one message was serious enough to affect the flight.
-
Question 2 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What can be inferred about the passenger’s explanation?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It has already ended the legal case
- It proves the message was harmless
- It may influence later consideration of the case
- It caused officials to cancel the flight
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It may influence later consideration of the case
The explanation may be considered, but it does not settle the case.
The passenger’s account—that he had been drinking and meant the message as poorly expressed workplace banter—may be considered as the case continues.
-
Question 3 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
In the third paragraph, what does “that possibility” refer to?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- The possibility of workplace disagreement
- The possibility of an aircraft hijacking
- The possibility of poor drinking habits
- The possibility of a delayed legal hearing
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- The possibility of an aircraft hijacking
The phrase refers to the possibility of an aircraft hijacking.
In aviation, language suggesting that possibility can lead to an immediate security response because a possible threat must be treated seriously.
-
Question 4 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Why does the article mention that a charge is not proof of guilt?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- To explain why the flight returned
- To describe the meaning of banter
- To emphasize legal uncertainty
- To criticize aviation security
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- To emphasize legal uncertainty
This distinction prevents readers from treating an accusation as a final judgment.
A charge is an accusation, not proof that someone is guilty.
-
Question 5 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
How is the article organized?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- From general aviation history to unrelated examples
- From the event through analysis to practical implications
- From legal definitions to a detailed travel schedule
- From passenger opinions to airline advertisements
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- From the event through analysis to practical implications
It moves from the event to explanations, legal context, and broader lessons.
Clear communication matters especially in situations where safety officials must make quick decisions.
-
Question 6 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What relationship does the article establish between written language and security responses?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Written language always prevents confusion
- Written wording can remove context and increase concern
- Security officials ignore messages between colleagues
- Workplace messages cannot affect flights
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- Written wording can remove context and increase concern
Ambiguous written wording can trigger serious responses when safety is involved.
Written messages can lose the tone and context that the sender may believe are obvious.
-
Question 7 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What limitation does the article place on the passenger’s statement about drinking?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It cannot describe his behavior
- It cannot establish the case’s legal outcome
- It cannot explain the message’s wording
- It cannot be considered by anyone
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It cannot establish the case’s legal outcome
The statement explains his account but does not decide the legal case.
Drinking can also affect judgment and word choice, although the passenger’s statement is not a legal decision about the case.
What to review next
Find the words that support each answer. For a mistake, compare the question with the evidence and identify the detail or inference you missed.
A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.
Before you practise: a worked example
Look for evidence in the text. Separate what the writer says from what you already know about the topic.
The library normally closes at six, but on Fridays it stays open until eight. When does it close on Friday?
The answer is eight. But introduces an exception to the normal closing time, so the first time mentioned is not the answer.
This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.