Former Chicago FBI Chief Sues DOJ Over Broadview Six Case
About this practice test
Practice B1 English reading with 5 questions based on the Daily News article “Former Chicago FBI Chief Sues DOJ Over Broadview Six Case”.
What you’ll practice
Finding detail
Locate specific information and evidence.
Interpreting ideas
Connect main points and inferences.
Evaluating arguments
Assess claims, evidence, and limitations.
Study the questions and tasks
Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.
- Practice level
- B1. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.
- Question formats
- Single choice
How to approach this practice
Read the passage for its main idea, then return to the relevant sentence or paragraph for each question. Base answers on the passage.
News lesson for this practice
Read the complete article and use its text or audio alongside these exercises: Former Chicago FBI Chief Sues DOJ Over Broadview Six Case.
Former Chicago FBI Chief Sues DOJ Over Broadview Six Case
Douglas DePodesta, a former chief of the FBI office in Chicago, is suing the U.S. Department of Justice. He says he was wrongly blamed after prosecutions involving protesters known as the Broadview Six fell apart. DePodesta says U.S. Attorney Andrew S. Boutros led the prosecutions. He says he was forced out of his job after those cases failed. His legal claim links the end of his work in Chicago to…
-
Question 1 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What is the article mainly about?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- A new FBI investigation in Chicago
- A lawsuit about blame after failed prosecutions
- The history of the Broadview Six
- How federal lawyers are trained
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- A lawsuit about blame after failed prosecutions
The article explains DePodesta's lawsuit and his claim about unfair blame.
The lawsuit concerns responsibility for what happened after the prosecutions fell apart.
-
Question 2 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What does “those cases” refer to?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- Federal legal jobs
- Security issues
- The Broadview Six prosecutions
- Court processes
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- The Broadview Six prosecutions
The phrase refers to the prosecutions mentioned in the previous sentence.
He says he was forced out of his job after those cases failed.
-
Question 3 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
Why does the article explain the Justice Department's role?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- To describe the protesters' jobs
- To explain the defendant's role
- To report a new federal law
- To introduce Chicago's history
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- To explain the defendant's role
The explanation helps readers understand the organization being sued.
The Justice Department is the U.S. government department responsible for federal legal work.
-
Question 4 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What connection does DePodesta make in his legal claim?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- His job and the failed prosecutions
- The FBI and local elections
- The protesters and security issues
- The court and federal training
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- His job and the failed prosecutions
He connects his work ending with the prosecutions' collapse.
His legal claim links the end of his work in Chicago to the collapse of the Broadview Six prosecutions.
-
Question 5 · Single choice
Choose one answer.
What limitation of a lawsuit does the article state?
Return to the passage, recording or visual- It cannot name government workers
- It cannot involve federal cases
- It does not automatically prove the claim
- It does not allow court processes
Check answers and explanations
- Answer
- It does not automatically prove the claim
A lawsuit begins a court process but does not prove the claim.
It does not, by itself, decide whether that claim is correct.
What to review next
Find the words that support each answer. For a mistake, compare the question with the evidence and identify the detail or inference you missed.
A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.
Before you practise: a worked example
Look for evidence in the text. Separate what the writer says from what you already know about the topic.
The library normally closes at six, but on Fridays it stays open until eight. When does it close on Friday?
The answer is eight. But introduces an exception to the normal closing time, so the first time mentioned is not the answer.
This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.