Sandusky Lawyers Ask to Delay Hearing on Accuser’s Claimed Recantation

Study the questions and tasks

Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.

Practice level

C2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.

Question formats

Single choice

How to approach this practice

Read the questions, then listen before opening the transcript. Notice names, numbers and any corrections the speaker makes.

1. Question 1 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   According to the report, who is seeking the delay?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. ABC News editors
   2. The accuser’s family
   3. Sandusky’s lawyers
   4. The Penn State coaching staff
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Sandusky’s lawyers

   The opening sentence identifies the legal team as the actor making the request.

   Lawyers for former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky are asking that a scheduled hearing be canceled or postponed, according to ABC News.

2. Question 2 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does the legal team want done to the hearing?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Expanded and televised
   2. Put off rather than held as scheduled
   3. Moved to another jurisdiction
   4. Combined with a separate trial
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Put off rather than held as scheduled

   The report states two requested alternatives: cancellation or postponement.

   Instead of allowing the hearing to go forward as scheduled, Sandusky’s legal team wants it put off.

3. Question 3 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does the recording say about a replacement date?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It was announced for the following week
   2. It was fixed by the court
   3. It was omitted from the report
   4. It was rejected as unnecessary
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   It was omitted from the report

   No alternative date is supplied if the hearing is delayed.

   The supplied report does not say whether that request has been granted, nor does it provide a replacement date if the hearing is delayed.

4. Question 4 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What is the first of the two matters the recording separates?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The scheduling dispute
   2. The public context of Penn State
   3. The accuser’s intention to recant
   4. The court’s final determination
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   The accuser’s intention to recant

   The first matter is the accuser’s stated intention concerning earlier allegations.

   The first is the accuser’s stated intention to recant earlier allegations.

5. Question 5 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What public context does the source provide about Sandusky?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. His current judicial position
   2. His former coaching position at Penn State
   3. His role as a current university official
   4. His employment with ABC News
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   His former coaching position at Penn State

   It identifies his former role as an assistant football coach at Penn State.

   The source identifies Sandusky by his former position as an assistant football coach at Penn State, which supplies the relevant public context without resolving the legal questions surrounding the case.

6. Question 6 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What might the proceeding draw renewed attention to?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The university’s athletic budget
   2. The account and the order of related claims
   3. A newly identified witness
   4. The hearing’s replacement venue
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   The account and the order of related claims

   The recording links renewed attention to the disputed account and its chronology.

   A proceeding concerning a claimed recantation could draw renewed attention to the account at issue and to the sequence in which the allegations and later claim are considered.

7. Question 7 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Which information does the supplied coverage expressly omit?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The coach’s former occupation
   2. The existence of a scheduled hearing
   3. The accuser’s motive and possible evidence
   4. The lawyers’ request to delay
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   The accuser’s motive and possible evidence

   The recording lists the accuser’s motive, possible evidence, and assessment method as unknown.

   However, the supplied coverage does not explain why the accuser wants to recant, describe what evidence might be presented, or indicate how the hearing would assess the competing accounts.

8. Question 8 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What action is confirmed at the recording’s conclusion?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. A ruling on the original allegations
   2. A final decision about the recantation
   3. An effort to put off the proceeding
   4. A replacement hearing date
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   An effort to put off the proceeding

   The conclusion limits certainty to the lawyers’ effort to delay the proceeding.

   For now, the confirmed action is limited: Sandusky’s lawyers are seeking to put off the scheduled proceeding, while the accuser’s claim remains an issue the hearing was expected to examine.

What to review next

Listen again to difficult sections, then open the transcript to check what you heard. Repeat a useful phrase aloud and try the recording once more without the text.

A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.

Before you practise: a worked example

Listen for the final information, especially when a speaker corrects or changes an earlier statement.

Example transcript: “Let’s meet at five — actually, half past five would be better.” What is the final suggested time?

The final suggested time is 5:30. Actually signals a correction; the first time is replaced by the later suggestion.

This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.