C2 Proficient Listening Work 25 minutes 8 questions

Nvidia shares fall as company investigates alleged link involving CEO Jensen Huang

About this practice test

Listen to the C2 Daily News report “Nvidia shares fall as company investigates alleged link involving CEO Jensen Huang” and answer 8 comprehension questions.

What you’ll practice

Understanding detail

Follow specific information and examples.

Interpreting ideas

Identify main points and inferences.

Evaluating arguments

Assess claims, evidence, and limitations.

What to expect: 8 questions with explanations to review after submission.

Study the questions and tasks

Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.

Practice level
C2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.
Question formats
Single choice

How to approach this practice

Read the questions, then listen before opening the transcript. Notice names, numbers and any corrections the speaker makes.

News lesson for this practice

Read the complete article and use its text or audio alongside these exercises: Nvidia shares fall as company investigates alleged link involving CEO Jensen Huang.

Nvidia shares fall as company investigates alleged link involving CEO Jensen Huang

Read a transcript excerpt

Nvidia’s share price fell after the company said it was investigating an alleged relationship between its chief executive, Jensen Huang, and a woman accused of being a Chinese spy. The development places a question about the company’s leadership alongside an immediate market response, although the available account gives no figure for the decline. The allegation and the investigation should be distinguished. The woman is described as accused of spying for…

Read the full article and transcript.

  1. Question 1 · Single choice

    Choose one answer.

    Which details about the alleged relationship are not specified?

    Return to the passage, recording or visual
    1. Its location and the identity of the investigators.
    2. Its duration and the name of Huang’s company.
    3. Its financial cost and the identity of the investors.
    4. The woman’s identity and when it may have taken place.
    Check answers and explanations
    Answer
    The woman’s identity and when it may have taken place.

    The account omits both the woman’s identity and the possible timing.

    The account does not identify the woman, specify when the alleged relationship may have taken place, or explain what prompted the investigation.
  2. Question 2 · Single choice

    Choose one answer.

    What must listeners avoid assuming from the phrase “accused of being a Chinese spy”?

    Return to the passage, recording or visual
    1. That she engaged in espionage.
    2. That the company began an inquiry.
    3. That Nvidia’s shares fell.
    4. That the account leaves facts unspecified.
    Check answers and explanations
    Answer
    That she engaged in espionage.

    An accusation alone does not prove that espionage occurred.

    The woman is described as accused of spying for China; that description does not establish that she engaged in espionage.
  3. Question 3 · Single choice

    Choose one answer.

    What outcome does the recording say has not yet been set out?

    Return to the passage, recording or visual
    1. The company’s share price before the inquiry.
    2. The inquiry’s eventual findings and any further developments.
    3. The identity of Nvidia’s chief executive.
    4. The reported timing of the market decline.
    Check answers and explanations
    Answer
    The inquiry’s eventual findings and any further developments.

    The account contains no findings or subsequent developments.

    The eventual significance for the company will depend on what the investigation establishes and on any further developments; neither outcome is yet set out in the account.
  4. Question 4 · Single choice

    Choose one answer.

    Which possible effects on Nvidia are not indicated in the reported facts?

    Return to the passage, recording or visual
    1. A change in how investors assess risk.
    2. An investigation involving its chief executive.
    3. Effects on operations, financial results, or leadership arrangements.
    4. A reported fall in the share price.
    Check answers and explanations
    Answer
    Effects on operations, financial results, or leadership arrangements.

    The account reports no operational, financial, or leadership effects.

    For Nvidia, the inquiry concerns its chief executive, but the reported facts do not indicate any effect on the company’s operations, financial results, or leadership arrangements.
  5. Question 5 · Single choice

    Choose one answer.

    What does the account say about Huang’s response?

    Return to the passage, recording or visual
    1. He denied the alleged relationship.
    2. He confirmed that Nvidia had begun an inquiry.
    3. He declined to comment on the share-price decline.
    4. The account does not say whether he responded.
    Check answers and explanations
    Answer
    The account does not say whether he responded.

    It does not say whether he has responded.

    Nor do they say whether Huang has responded.
  6. Question 6 · Single choice

    Choose one answer.

    Which detail about the price movement is explicitly unavailable?

    Return to the passage, recording or visual
    1. The size of the decline.
    2. The company whose shares fell.
    3. The fact that a market response followed.
    4. The leadership issue accompanying that response.
    Check answers and explanations
    Answer
    The size of the decline.

    The account offers no numerical measure of the decline.

    The development places a question about the company’s leadership alongside an immediate market response, although the available account gives no figure for the decline.
  7. Question 7 · Single choice

    Choose one answer.

    What point does the recording make about share-price movements generally?

    Return to the passage, recording or visual
    1. They are reliable proof of wrongdoing by executives.
    2. They can reflect both risk expectations and financial assessments.
    3. They always reflect a company’s latest earnings alone.
    4. They reveal which investors sold shares and why.
    Check answers and explanations
    Answer
    They can reflect both risk expectations and financial assessments.

    Prices can embody expectations about risk and financial prospects.

    A change in a company’s share price can reflect investors’ expectations about risk as well as their assessment of its financial prospects.
  8. Question 8 · Single choice

    Choose one answer.

    What did Nvidia say it was doing after the share-price fall?

    Return to the passage, recording or visual
    1. Changing its leadership arrangements.
    2. Publishing the results of an internal review.
    3. Investigating an alleged relationship involving its chief executive.
    4. Confirming an allegation of espionage.
    Check answers and explanations
    Answer
    Investigating an alleged relationship involving its chief executive.

    The company said it was investigating an alleged relationship.

    Nvidia’s share price fell after the company said it was investigating an alleged relationship between its chief executive, Jensen Huang, and a woman accused of being a Chinese spy.

What to review next

Listen again to difficult sections, then open the transcript to check what you heard. Repeat a useful phrase aloud and try the recording once more without the text.

A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.

Before you practise: a worked example

Listen for the final information, especially when a speaker corrects or changes an earlier statement.

Example transcript: “Let’s meet at five — actually, half past five would be better.” What is the final suggested time?

The final suggested time is 5:30. Actually signals a correction; the first time is replaced by the later suggestion.

This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.