Former Fiancé of Nancy Mace and Two Associates Charged With Sex Crimes

Study the questions and tasks

Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.

Practice level

C2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.

Question formats

Single choice

How to approach this practice

Read the questions, then listen before opening the transcript. Notice names, numbers and any corrections the speaker makes.

1. Question 1 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What happened on Wednesday?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The House speech was delivered
   2. The incident allegedly occurred
   3. The charges were brought
   4. The defendants were convicted
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   The charges were brought

   The narration specifies Wednesday as the date when charges were brought.

   The charges were brought on Wednesday.

2. Question 2 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What must occur before an offense can be established?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The defendants must concede the allegations
   2. Prosecutors must establish the offense’s required elements
   3. The House must approve the criminal charges
   4. Mace must repeat her account in court
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Prosecutors must establish the offense’s required elements

   Prosecutors must prove every legally required component under the applicable standard.

   Prosecutors must establish the required elements of any offense under the relevant legal standard, while defendants are entitled to challenge the allegations.

3. Question 3 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does the recording say defendants can do?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Challenge the allegations
   2. Determine the legal standard
   3. Announce the final verdict
   4. Replace the prosecutors
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Challenge the allegations

   Defendants retain the right to contest the allegations during the legal process.

   Prosecutors must establish the required elements of any offense under the relevant legal standard, while defendants are entitled to challenge the allegations.

4. Question 4 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What is the stated function of a court process?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. To publicize political concerns
   2. To determine whether allegations can be legally proved
   3. To explain every private relationship
   4. To establish the date of the original incident
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   To determine whether allegations can be legally proved

   A court process evaluates whether allegations satisfy criminal-law requirements.

   A legislative speech can place a subject before the public, but a court process concerns whether the allegations can be proved according to legal rules.

5. Question 5 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Which relationship among the defendants is specified?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. All three were Mace’s legislative colleagues
   2. One was her former fiancé and two were his associates
   3. Two were prosecutors and one was a judge
   4. All three were witnesses to the House speech
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   One was her former fiancé and two were his associates

   One defendant was Mace’s former fiancé; the others were his business associates.

   The defendants’ relationship to Mace is central to the reported event: one is her former fiancé, and the other two are described as his business associates.

6. Question 6 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does the narration say about the incident’s timing?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The charges preceded the incident
   2. Both events occurred in 2018
   3. The incident preceded the later charges
   4. The incident’s date remains entirely unknown
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   The incident preceded the later charges

   The incident dates to 2018, whereas the charges came years afterward.

   The incident at issue dates back to 2018, while the charges were announced years later.

7. Question 7 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does the case link for Mace?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Her legislative vote with a sentencing decision
   2. Her personal account with legal action involving identified people
   3. Her business interests with a privacy statute
   4. Her House speech with a completed conviction
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Her personal account with legal action involving identified people

   It connects her earlier House account with a legal action involving identified people.

   For Mace, the development links a personal account she had already raised in the House with a legal action involving people she identified.

8. Question 8 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What process begins for the defendants?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. A process examining allegations through the courts
   2. An automatic determination of criminal guilt
   3. A legislative investigation into Mace’s career
   4. A public referendum on voyeurism laws
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   A process examining allegations through the courts

   The charges begin judicial examination of the allegations, without determining the outcome.

   For the defendants, the charges initiate a process in which the allegations will have to be examined through the courts.

What to review next

Listen again to difficult sections, then open the transcript to check what you heard. Repeat a useful phrase aloud and try the recording once more without the text.

A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.

Before you practise: a worked example

Listen for the final information, especially when a speaker corrects or changes an earlier statement.

Example transcript: “Let’s meet at five — actually, half past five would be better.” What is the final suggested time?

The final suggested time is 5:30. Actually signals a correction; the first time is replaced by the later suggestion.

This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.