Holdout Juror Says Lindsay Clancy Was “Methodical” in the Killing of Her Three Children

Study the questions and tasks

Work through the material below, or start the interactive practice above to complete an attempt. Try the exercises before opening any answer or transcript sections, then use them to review your work.

Practice level

B2. Try this level if you can follow the instructions and understand most of the language; choose an earlier level if you need more support.

Question formats

Single choice

How to approach this practice

Read the questions, then listen before opening the transcript. Notice names, numbers and any corrections the speaker makes.

1. Question 1 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   When did Desronvil make the remarks?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. During the original trial
   2. On October 15, 2026
   3. Before the jury was selected
   4. After a later appeal
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   On October 15, 2026

   The narration gives the date at the conclusion.

   The comments were reported on October 15, 2026, in coverage of the interview.

2. Question 2 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What did Desronvil’s comments mainly concern?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. The jury’s private voting procedure
   2. The defendant’s legal representation
   3. Actions and the thought behind them
   4. The location of the reported event
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Actions and the thought behind them

   The narration identifies his understanding of actions and thought involved.

   In this case, Desronvil’s comments focused on his understanding of Clancy’s actions and the level of thought he believed was involved.

3. Question 3 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What did Desronvil believe about the killings?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. They occurred without preparation
   2. They resulted from deliberate thinking
   3. They were caused by jury disagreement
   4. They were unrelated to responsibility
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   They resulted from deliberate thinking

   He believed they involved planning rather than a lack of preparation.

   His explanation presents the issue as one of judgment and responsibility: he considered the alleged actions to be the result of deliberate thinking rather than something that happened without preparation.

4. Question 4 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What does the interview fail to add about the legal outcome?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Details about the interview date
   2. Information beyond his wish for conviction
   3. A definition of a holdout juror
   4. His description of the defendant
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Information beyond his wish for conviction

   The narration says it adds no wider outcome beyond his wish for conviction.

   It also does not add information about the wider legal outcome beyond Desronvil’s stated wish for a conviction.

5. Question 5 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   Why might the account give readers a clearer sense of Desronvil’s decision?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. It records every argument from the trial
   2. It reveals reasoning behind his decision
   3. It identifies the other jurors’ votes
   4. It supplies the complete legal outcome
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   It reveals reasoning behind his decision

   His description reveals the reasoning he said shaped his decision.

   His description of Clancy as methodical gives readers a clearer sense of the reasoning he said shaped his decision.

6. Question 6 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What contrast is emphasized in the final paragraph?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Personal explanation versus complete account
   2. Interview date versus trial location
   3. Evidence versus courtroom procedure
   4. Conviction versus jury selection
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   Personal explanation versus complete account

   The recording contrasts his account with a complete record of trial considerations.

   However, the remarks remain his explanation of the case, rather than a complete account of every argument or fact considered during the trial.

7. Question 7 · Single choice

   Choose one answer.

   What happened before Desronvil explained his reasons?

   Return to the passage, recording or visual
   1. Other jurors released their views
   2. He described the defendant as methodical
   3. The article supplied the trial transcript
   4. The court announced a wider outcome
   Check answers and explanations

   Answer

   He described the defendant as methodical

   The report first identifies the interview and his description, then explains his reasons.

   In his first interview with Fox News, he described the defendant as “methodical” and explained why he wanted her convicted.

What to review next

Listen again to difficult sections, then open the transcript to check what you heard. Repeat a useful phrase aloud and try the recording once more without the text.

A focused practice result shows how you did on these tasks. Use several activities across skills to decide what to study next; one practice score does not certify an overall CEFR level.

Before you practise: a worked example

Listen for the final information, especially when a speaker corrects or changes an earlier statement.

Example transcript: “Let’s meet at five — actually, half past five would be better.” What is the final suggested time?

The final suggested time is 5:30. Actually signals a correction; the first time is replaced by the later suggestion.

This teaching example is separate from the scored questions. After your test, compare any mistakes with the explanation and revisit the topic before trying again.